MPLS seems to be the next generation of communication. There are numerous applications that can benefit from the advantages of this latest technology allows for data packets through the use of labels in order to prioritize them. Of course, it is still in the "early days".
MPLS is what ATM should have been. All traffic control of ATM, without the limitations of fixed cell sizes. In general, when you manage different QoS services, MPLS the right answer for lines with high bandwidth, is ATMthe correct answer for lines with low bandwidth (which is why it is used for DSL).
Many products have the MPLS label, but beware - there are several partial implementations (Cisco included) of the MPLS data, many of which do not give you the full range of QoS and hence support for the implementation of various services at the same time. For multi-service networks, MPLS, which I will rely on the networks today would - but please check the fine print to make sure they really do what youwant.
I would say that MPLS is the "now" (not the next) generation of backbone technology. In Europe and Asia-Pacific region is already the technology of choice for most new WAN implementations .... and call the number a service offer by the majority of Global Telco's, not the focus of the suppliers.
My only caution would be not to forget to compare the business cases for MPLS and legacy technologies competing in terms of a change. Often, the push service provider customers in MPLSbecause it is fashionable, and the margins are better for them, because they can bundle multiple services with it (data and VoIP, plus advanced network monitoring tools, etc.). Whether costs MPLS "in" for a customer will depend on:
(a) existing and future bandwidth requirements;
(b) the need to bow to bandwidth on demand;
(c) geographical distribution of the WAN (removal of the stock exchange and regulatory reasons).
There have been cases where companies have the mid-term would have been theRollout of an MPLS WAN .... to recognize only that they are going to spend more money (not less) to a technology, not the benefit they really are. Also, some companies MPLS have thrown overboard, when they realized that they could double their existing ATM bandwidth cheaper and faster in some places .... rather than deploy MPLS.
Overall, however, with (a) the updating of the network infrastructure is now better built into the operating budget, and (b) the realization that things like VOIP and convergence of legacy andcurrent data networks are no longer a leap of faith, and (c) the removal of premiums for MPLS services - it is really always the standard technology for today's wide area networks.
British Telecom and all the other British, European and U.S. telcos can imagine I am me, all provide MPLS as a carrier backbone technology. It is very likely that if you buy ATM in some places today, it will be encapsulated over MPLS anyway!
Every major telecommunications companies in the U.S. drives MPLS. In fact,Sprint is the task of the Frame Relay service received at the end of the year all on their MPLS network.
Remember that you have to MPLS at each site in order to take full advantage of technology. But everyone from the U.S. phone company ATT, Sprint, Verizon, GX, the service can offer the world.
Just a side note, "Aw Ha moment ".... The advertised cost however, depends on your network topology and the telco is used.
For example,
Sprint: Removalfrom a traditional frame relay network, an MPLS network will save you money. If you have a fully meshed frame relay network, the savings is greater. Why? For with the Sprint Class of Service is free. One comes from the loop + port + PVCs to loop + port.
Verizon Business: Verizon offers AUTO (Commmitted access prices) with its MPLS offering (Private IP or PIP). You do not need to PVCs, but now you need for CAS, depending on what you want, can pay the same or even more.
ALL MPLSOffers allow the customers who do not yet have a fully meshed network is now the benefits of a. This also plays into the most customer disaster recovery plans.
Well .... to use a devil on the issue of the hype of MPLS.
First look-MPLS CoS Class of Service (not), the ATM QoS "means" provide for true clarity of the subject. The problem that I have seen and dealt with the surrounding MPLS is its implementation. The widely perceived as "cheap" - or lower cost (that word as you want)Solution for ATM and it is to some degree (equipment wise) - but also some other service.
Well, actually for MPLS to be activated the entire route from point A to point B must MPLS. So say some agencies have a say in England and in place B, Chicago, those are all the way from both locations (priority must be enabled) MPLS. Or are your packet markings useless.
Here is an example of packet flow:
VoIP call from London -> Provider A (MPLS)
Provider A-> Upstream -> upstream provider (No MPLS)
Upstream provider -> Back to the situation (not MPLS)
Then have activated the upstream provider is not MPLS, everything you think "" You better done was worthless. The MPLS 6509 and better configured, made no dent in your movement speed, you saved zero dollars.
Static routing ?..... MPLS is highly dependent on static routes, routes, route flaps go down. Fact of life. MPLS is stupid and brutally takes an incredible amount ofConfiguration to the engineers for failover scenarios.
QoS ?..... The same is true, you can paint your packages rainbow colors. If the upstream or someone out of the way strips the colors, the fruitless effort. Vendors - especially bandwidth providers - are not mentioned, such as MPLS is not all that cracks up to. They will pitch a product. "Fastest bandwidth on the planet." But unless the sites are strictly limited to the provider network. There is no guarantee from another providerYou get all the glory staining of packets (QoS / CoS) MPLS or ATM. Outside of these ...... MPLS is IP-based and succeptible for all types of attacks. At least in the ATM attack methods are somewhat more difficult.
Now that you have thoroughly investigated .... You can make the decision for MPLS (or not) more easily by an unbiased consultant. My number 1 recommendation is to take advantage of free services at DS3 take Bandwidth.com.
Windows7 Digital Recorder dvd burning software
Continuar leyendo 
Ocultar articulo 
