When Does OC3 Bandwidth useful as your business network backbone?

Several factors may play a role, including the need for this kind of bandwidth and latency factors and resilience. If a client needs a highly reliable connection with low latency and high bandwidth, a protected SONET OC3 solution is the best choice in the way of architecture.

If you are strict requirements in terms of latency and the quality of the OC3 could be a good choice as an alternative to Ethernet services.

With OC3 You have completeEnd-2-end monitoring of bit errors, and it is also dedicated to 100% for your use. Ethernet services do not have the complete end-2-end monitoring capabillity as skipped frames could come alog's way.

The CPE equipment costs more for OC3, as for Ethernet. The redundancy built into SONET / SDH can provide sub 50ms conversion easy, but to the full potential of the redundancy of the harvest, you must have offcourse Redundant fiber to your location.

Prerequisites check

1) data sharingRequirements

2) Redundancy is a feature, not required. Therefore, the architecture is designed to request and fees.

3) Other (possibly linked) options that are available provide similar bandwidth

Optimum conditions

1) Several key hub locations (and the OC3 ring) that are well connected to the rest of the network

2) A CONTINUOUS bandwidth of more than DS3 24x7

3) A well-integrated voice and data architecture that can run acrossthis backbone, and therefore reduce the PSTN and Dedicated Access data line costs.

4) Purchase Existing relationships with the CPE equipment providers, allowing you to lower CPE costs

I think everyone would agree on a monetary point of view that if the costs exceed the cost of the DS3 then with the OC-x-start circuit, it is time to think about a switch. The problem lies in the fact that you are already heavily invested in the hardware, DS3, and now have to buy OC-xHardware to start a migration. So you have the hardware cost with the cost factor equation.

Second, one must keep an eye on redundancy and latency. If your network is critical and requires no downtime, then it becomes a little more complicated. Order 1 to guarantee OC3 still not sonet, without downtime. To ensure that this downtime to a minimum of 2 OC3 circuits order is maintained. When ordering the first one you want it to be the primary with the lowestLatency / jitter between two points. Their route will not be so redundant. This circuit will not touch any hardware, CO, line across a barren field that your primary use. This will mean a slower and lower quality circuit, but that the connection is a hit in case your primary system will be managed.

Once again, that starts to affect the cost equation. If management starts on the costs they should be reminded of how much it would cost concernsThey have every kind of failure. Today's consumers do not tolerate any interruption of services of all kinds more so the longer your services are not available, the higher your churn ultimately may be. There is a big difference between reducing services and no service to the customer. If it slowly, they are usually shrug it off, unless it is always slow. The second is it goes to start it, to agitate.

Since most LANs are Ethernet, WAN connectivity is most efficiently achieved through the creation of an Ethernet Internet(Lowercase "i" means a network of smaller networks built, but not necessarily the Internet (uppercase "I") to your home PC is connected). There is no translation, as with an OC3, and there is very little effort, as with ATM solutions.

Most voice applications or with TDM (the OC3 Protocol) and TDM natively any size circuit breaks into individual 64K voice channels, usually with 56 for the payload and 8K for signaling (although ISDN 64K used for payload andmaintains a separate channel for signaling). The great thing aboput TDM is that it is very reliable. If the track is over less than the nominal rate is broken and goes into alarm. Under Ethernet, its possible to a loss of throughput, without an alarm.

Both TDM and Ethernet can by the carrier, but oversubscribed, drop what equipment you need information to go without either alarm.

The catch is that using more and more voice applicationsVoice-over-internet (lowercase "i") protocol, which is more effective than Ethernet. That does not mean that the companies use the Internet (uppercase "I", the thing is your computer at home connected to), it means that the same protocol used to deliver voice over private Ethernet circuits.

VoIP is now the most important protocol for long distance.

So, if you are a telecommunications company with a legacy switch architecture that can not be replaced, an OC3 makes great sense.

If you have a buildingData network or voice network and local carriers have Ethernet available and the Ethernet service includes your required level of redundancy, then Ethernet is preferred by an overwhelming majority.

A Cisco network can be fired the same 50 ms failover to a 2-fiber SONET multi-path failover bring very little latency (a network that we 1ms provision is at the core and 2 ms, respectively on the serial interfaces, for which a total of five milliseconds latency). Ethernet can also be designed forPoint-to-multipoint applications at Layer 2 and Layer 3 with very simple means. OC3s (TDM) requires a large deployment of Ethernet router, ATM switch or Frame Switch with large operational overheads and the need to program the visibility (the ability for each site to communicate directly with another site).

Sun. . An OC3 useful if you have more than 45 Mbps will need, but less than 163 Mbps, Ethernet is not available or not available in a sufficiently robust design, or if your networkLegacy protocols used can not be replaced.

Price of complete solution to the requirements and specifications will be established, but Ethernet is much less expensive in general.

For help in finding the best solution for your situation, and applications .... whether it is Ethernet or OC3 bandwidth .... Simply submit an application via DS3 Bandwidth Solutions. By the way .... their help is free.

Wireless Router Hd Dvr Windows7